Wednesday, December 31, 2014
Yet another way humans are messing with the oceans: doubling nitrogen.
On top of rising sea levels, ocean acidification and
increasing temperatures, new research shows that we are changing the chemistry
of the seas by doubling the Pacific's nitrogen.
(Image: Scientists aboard the research vessel Ka'imikai-O-Kanaloa
study ocean chemistry as part of the Hawaii Ocean Time-series (HOT) Program in
the North Pacific Ocean. Credit: Paul Lethaby, UH SOEST.)
The changes are due to human-generated nitrogen compounds
that are changing the composition of the ocean from one that is short on
nitrogen to one that has lots of nitroen and is short of phosphous. What that does is change the
fertilization of the marine world.
What does it all mean?
“The possible impacts of this anthropogenic perturbation on
the open-ocean nitrogen cycle are numerous,” say the authors of a new paper, Increasing
anthropogenic nitrogen in the North Pacific Ocean.
University of Hawai`i researcher David Karl joins co-authors
Il-Nam Kim, Kitack Lee, Nicolas Gruber, John L. Bullister, Simon Yang and Tae-Wook
Kim from Korea, Switzerland and NOAA in writing the paper, which appeared in
the Nov. 28, 2014 issue of the journal Science.
The found that reactive nitrogen from fossil fuel burning and
fertilizer that flows off agricultural and urban areas has doubled in the
oceans during the past century.
"This is a sobering result, one that I would not have
predicted," said Karl. "The
North Pacific is so vast it is hard to imagine that humans could impact the
natural nitrogen cycle."
This is not the first paper to see increasing levels of
nitrogen, but is dramatic in part because it finds the increase is present
throughout the ocean. Previous studies have found similar results nearer
continents, and especially near Asia.
“The possible impacts of this anthropogenic perturbation on
the open-ocean nitrogen cycle are numerous,” the paper says.
While it might seem that fertilizing the ocean could improve
productivity, in fact it might change productivity in unanticipated ways—favoring
species that like a higher nitrogen and lower phosphorus environment—with potentially
unfavorable results.
“If similar trends are confirmed in the Atlantic and Indian
Oceans, it would constitute another example of a global-scale alteration of the
Earth system. Further, the findings of this study of the North Pacific
highlight the need for greater controls on the emission of nitrogen compounds
during combustion and agricultural processes.,” said a University of Hawai`ipress release on the research.
The Swiss university ETH Zurich issued a press release that
explains the results this way:
“When fossil fuels are burned at high temperatures, such as
in coal and gas-fired power stations, nitrogen oxide and other reactive nitrogen
compounds are formed and released into the atmosphere. Agricultural activities
also have the same effect, when a part of the nitrogen found in fertiliser is
lost into the atmosphere in the form of nitrogen oxide or ammonia. These
emissions have risen dramatically in the past decades, particularly in East
Asia where they have grown by 40 per cent in the past 10 years.”
How does the nitrogen get into the ocean? “The increase of
the nitrate concentration in the North Pacific is mostly attributable to
combustion processes in East Asia and to a lesser extent from agricultural
activities in that region. The prevailing westerly winds carry these substances
across the Pacific, where the rain flushes them from the air into the sea,” the
Swiss university said.
Citation: I-N Kim, K Lee, N Gruber, D M Karl, J L Bullister,
S Yang, T-W Kim (2014). Increasing anthropogenic nitrogen in the North Pacific
Ocean. Science, 27 November 2014.
© Jan TenBruggencate 2014
Posted by Jan T at 7:47 AM 0 comments
Labels: Agriculture, Botany, Climate Change, Energy, Fisheries, Marine Issues, Oceanography, Pollution, Reefs, Wind, Zoology
Friday, December 26, 2014
Obesity and heart disease: mixed messages
Here’s another good reason to be very leery about second-hand
reports about scientific study results.
Finally, it seems, new reports found some good news about
being obese and having heart disease—or did they?
The studies suggest that people who suffer heart failure and
who are obese are more likely to be alive a year later than thin folks are. Researchers
call it the “obesity paradox.” Here’s one of those studies, in the December
2013 Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
Kinda seems like good news to those of us carrying a few
extra pounds.
But almost every news medium and even Elsevier, a publisher of scientific papers, got this story wrong—suggesting that fat was protective against
heart disease: “Is being overweight sometimes a good thing? Data suggest higher
BMI protects against adverse cardiovascular outcomes, reports Mayo Clinic
Proceedings.”
And that, of course, is wrong, wrong, dangerously wrong.
Here’s what the papers really say: If you already have heart
disease, then you’re less likely to die soon if you’re too fat than if you’re too
skinny.
The first study listed above says it clearly enough: “Although
obesity is an independent risk factor for heart failure (HF), once HF is
established, obesity is associated with lower mortality.”
The suggestion that obesity protects against heart disease “is
potentially a dangerous message to promulgate from retrospective data in an
environment saturated with an obesity epidemic and obesity-related conditions
such as type 2 diabetes mellitus and coronary heart disease,” say these researchers in a Mayo Clinic journal.
And the authors of still another paper say: “In our large,
community-based sample, increased body-mass index was associated with an
increased risk of heart failure. Given the high prevalence of obesity in the
United States, strategies to promote optimal body weight may reduce the
population burden of heart failure.”
Being fat makes you twice as likely to get heart disease as people of healthy weight. But once you’re real sick, the fat folks with
heart disease are 22-27 percent less likely to die in the short term. The
obesity paradox discussion in popular media generally only looks at the second
half of that equation.
It’s a little like cell phone company XXX saying, “If you’ll
pay double for this $500 phone, I’ll give you $250 back and it’ll only
cost you $750.” And then all the media saying you ought to choose cell company
XXX because of the great rebate, not mentioning that you’re paying a 50 percent
premium.
The American Heart Association notes that: “Obesity
increases the risk for heart disease and stroke.”
And not only that, “but it harms more than just the heart
and blood vessel system. It's also a major cause of gallstones, osteoarthritis
and respiratory problems.”
A 2013 study confirms this: “Epidemiological studies have
recently shown that obesity, and abdominal obesity in particular, is an
independent risk factor for the development of heart failure.”
The key statistics: nearly 70 percent of people with heart
disease are obese, and, from this study by the Massachusetts Medical Society, “As
compared with subjects with a normal body-mass index, obese subjects had a
doubling of the risk of heart failure.”
And the bigger you get, the higher the risk: “A graded
increase in the risk of heart failure was observed across categories of
body-mass index.”
Why is this important for Hawai`i? The state’s obesity rate climbed from under 10 percent in 1990 to more than 20 percent now.
While we have nearly the lowest obesity rate in the nation (21.8 percent, with only Colorado lower at 21.3), consider
this: In 1991, no state in the U.S. had an obesity rate above 20 percent. Now
they all do.
And while our rate in the Islands is comparatively low, it’s still dangerously high—in 2013 26.8 percent
for men and 20.3 for women. In 2010, there were more than 78,000 people in the Islands
with heart disease.
Sending mixed messages about the dangers of obesity is a danger in itself.
© Jan TenBruggencate 2014
Posted by Jan T at 6:58 AM 0 comments
Labels: Exercise, Health/Medical
Sunday, December 7, 2014
UH research: Warming's dark twin, acidification, eroding reefs.
Global warming’s dark twin, ocean acidification, is
disrupting life in the oceans as dangerously as warming itself.
A recent study by University of Hawai`i researcher Nyssa
Silbiger and her colleagues indicates that coral reefs are eroding as
increasingly acid oceans eat away at their calcium carbonate structures.
(Image: MicroCT scan of experimental blocks reveals
bioerosion scars. Credit: N Silbiger, M Riccio/Cornell.)
Corals are always in dynamic tension, as the building work
of coral polyps is balanced against the destructive work of parrotfish and
boring marine worms. But studies at the University of Hawai`i Institute of
Marine Biology shows that acidification is tipping the scales toward
destruction.
The paper, Reefs shift from net accretion to net erosion along a natural environmental gradient,
by Silbiger, and co-researchers Òscar Guadayol, Florence I. M. Thomas and Megan
J. Donahuein, is in the journal Marine Ecology Progress Series.
Researchers placed coral blocks onto the Kane`ohe Bay reef
for a year, measuring them before and after by both weight and high-resolution computed
tomography (CT) scans. Different parts of the reef have different levels of
acidity, current flow, temperatures and other variables.
They found that the big predictor of coral erosion was
acidity of the water. And since oceans are expected to continue to acidify from
carbon-dioxide loading, that’s bad news for reefs.
And particularly bad news for reef areas subject to higher
levels of acidity. The study found that rather than being uniform, acidity
levels vary both in place and time.
“It was surprising to discover that small-scale changes in
the environment can influence ecosystem-level reef processes. We saw changes in pH on the order of meters
and those small pH changes drove the patterns in reef accretion-erosion,”
Silbiger said in a news release.
What does it all mean?
“Our findings suggest that increases in reef erosion,
combined with expected decreases in calcification, will accelerate the shift of
coral reefs to an erosion-dominated system in a high-CO2 world.
"This shift will
make reefs increasingly susceptible to storm damage and sea-level rise,
threatening the maintenance of the ecosystem services that coral reefs provide,”
the researchers write.
Citation: NJ Silbiger, O Guadoyal, FIM Thomas, MJ Donahue
(2014) Reefs shift from net accretion to net erosion along a natural
environmental gradient. Marine Ecology Progress Series, vol. 515, doi:
10.3354/meps10999
© Jan TenBruggencate 2014
Posted by Jan T at 10:13 AM 0 comments
Labels: Botany, Climate Change, Fisheries, Geology, Marine Issues, Oceanography, Reefs, Zoology
Friday, December 5, 2014
Hurricanes self-feed, sucking up El Nino heat from the deep ocean
It has long been asserted that El Nino events, warming the
tropical Pacific as they do, promote hurricanes—but it may not occur as we’ve
previously assumed.
(Image: Hurricane tracks shown in black in the eastern and
central Pacific. Credit: Jin/SOEST.)
University of Hawai`i researchers have identified a two or
three-season delay that explains a lot about hurricane behavior. The El Nino
hot water sinks, moves in the ocean, and then surges back to the surface to
fuel tropical cyclones.
And that’s important information in terms of predicting
hurricane frequency and ferocity.
Fei-Fei Jin and Julien Boucharel, both of the UH Mānoa
School of Ocean and Earth Science and Technology (SOEST), published their study in the journal Nature.
The researchers looked into the phenomenon in which El Nino
is strongest in winter, but hurricane frequency picks up in the following summer
and fall. At that time, most of the heated water from the El Nino is stored
deep in the ocean of the eastern North Pacific.
But it may be that the activity of a young hurricane can
suck that warm water to the surface, in essence finding the heat needed to
fuel itself and supercharge the hurricane’s strength.
“We did not connect the discharged heat of El Niño to the
fueling of hurricanes until recently, when we noticed another line of active
research in the tropical cyclone community that clearly demonstrated that a
strong hurricane is able to get its energy not only from the warm surface
water, but also by causing warm, deep water – up to 100 meters deep – to upwell
to the surface,” Jin said. He was quoted in a University of Hawai`i press release.
Boucharel said that extra heat provides a lot of destructive
energy.
“The Northeastern Pacific is a region normally without
abundant subsurface heat. El Niño’s heat discharged into this region provides
conditions to generate abnormal amount of intense hurricanes that may threaten
Mexico, the southwest of the U.S. and the Hawaiian islands,” he said.
The authors wrote in the Nature paper: “we show that El
Niño—the warm phase of an ENSO cycle—effectively discharges heat into the
eastern North Pacific basin two to three seasons after its wintertime peak,
leading to intensified TCs.”
They continue: “As a result of the time involved in ocean
transport, El Niño’s equatorial subsurface ‘heat reservoir’, built up in boreal
winter, appears in the eastern North Pacific several months later during peak (tropical cylone) season (boreal summer and autumn).
"By means of this delayed ocean transport
mechanism, ENSO provides an additional heat supply favourable for the formation
of strong hurricanes.”
© Jan TenBruggencate 2014
Posted by Jan T at 10:16 AM 0 comments
Labels: Climate Change, Energy, Marine Issues, Oceanography, Weather, Wind
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)