Sunday, April 16, 2017
A new look at Polynesian voyaging. After initial contact, maybe it was all about goods and services.
Polynesians maintained distant voyaging links through much of the history of
their Pacific occupation.
It was a kind of connectivity that helped new island
occupations succeed, and kept voyaging communities vibrant. And why? Some of it may have been just business--meeting the need for trade.
This ocean connection “was a deliberate enabling strategy essential
for colonising the remote Pacific…this process played out on a canvas of
different archipelagos with contrasting resources, both small and large
islands, and with varying levels of ecological diversity and remoteness,” wrote
Marshall Weisler and Richard Walter, in a new book, The Routledge Handbook of Archaeology and Globalization.
The evidence of the long-term connection between distant
islands comes in many forms.
One example, of course, is a famous adze, sourced from a
quarry on the Hawaiian island of Kaho`olawe, and found by archaeologists in the
Tuamotu islands far to the south. It proved that the Polynesian voyaging that
led to the discovery and population of the Hawaiian Islands was not a one-time
accidental event, but that there were return voyages.
How important was that?
“One Tuamotuan adze was identified as originating from the
Hawaiian islands, a distance of ͠ 4000 km—making it the longest known,
continuous maritime trip in world prehistory,” they wrote.
In the Cook Islands, there was evidence of active trade.
Basalt for adze blades has been found on coral islands without hard rock of
their own. And pearl shell for fishhooks and scrapers has been found on
volcanic islands where the pearl oysters didn’t grow. The assumption is that
the fine-grained basalt and black-lipped pearl shell were traded by voyagers.
And there is also a strong oral tradition of voyaging that
backs up the archaeology. In the Cooks, there are stories of the famous
navigator-voyagers Tangi`ia, Karika and others. Hawai`i has the stories of
Mo`ikeha and his voyaging son Kila.
Weisler and Walter argue that goods traveled back and forth,
not only resupplying small island communities, but also bringing goods back to
parent communities. The voyagers brought not only rock and shell, but planting
material, volcanic glass for fine cutting, and even marriage partners.
Hawai`i even has a tradition of the priest Pa`ao, who felt
Hawaiians were lacking adequate leadership, sailing to Tahiti to bring back a
chief to rule them. The chief was Pilika`aiea.
For some islands, such voyaging was critical to the survival
of the community. The small, isolated Pitcairn group could only have survived
with the assistance of “repeated resourcing from the parent populations on
Mangareva,” the authors wrote.
Not every island group had much to offer in material goods,
but some had other values. The Tuamotu Islands, for example, have few
resources, but they sprawl across the ocean, and they’re hard to miss. That
being the case, they are a convenient stopping place to establish a voyager’s
position, so it would have been valuable to keep their residents part of the “family.”
Hawai`i's voyaging canoe Hokule`a has regularly used the Tuamotus as an intermediate stop, to confirm the accuracy of navigation.
“There was little economic reason to travel to the Tuamotus,
but their location made them a navigational screen that captured any movement
in the region, and no doubt they benefited from this,” Weisler and Walter
wrote.
Limits are one of the hallmarks of island societies. There
is a point at which further population increase, or further drawdown of
resources, cannot be sustained.
“In Mangareva during late prehistory food scarcities drove
people to steal growing crops and rob breadfruit storage pits (the main
staple), and there are even instances of fresh meat cannibalism and unearthing
graves of newly buried corpses for food,” they wrote.
Some anthropologists argue that population
pressure was a promoter of new voyaging, to find new islands and new resources.
But perhaps the opposite was sometimes also true. Population
pressure could have rendered voyaging difficult or inadvisable.
“Constructing ‘expensive’ voyaging canoes and resourcing
their crews was no longer a priority. Indeed, it was risky to leave
agricultural lands unprotected to engage in long-distance voyaging trips,” Weisler
and Walter suggest.
So, maybe islands full of people and short of resources caused societies to look inward instead of outward, ending the great Polynesian traditions of voyaging.
That said, the cultural memory of the voyaging days has
resulted in a paradigm that still exists today. “Interaction and exchange is …a
part of the fabric of Pacific life,” the authors wrote.
© 2017 Jan W. TenBruggencate
Posted by Jan T at 10:17 AM
Labels: Agriculture, Archaeology, Book Review, Botany, Geology, Marine Issues, Reefs, Voyaging
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
5 comments:
The Kaho`olawe adze from the Tuamotus is from an undated context. It might be true that it is evidence for return voyaging -- no one seriously doubts return voyaging nowadays -- but it is not possible to rule out transport of the adze during the historic period.
Thanks for the previous comment. It's a valid point. It's certainly possible, although I'm not aware of any pattern of Western ships carrying Polynesian artifacts from Hawaii into the deep South Pacific. Perhaps rather than viewing this on its own, it's better to consider it a single data point among many that support the extent of Polynesian voyaging.
Aloha. Do you have some good citations supporting these thought? Thank you.
Most of what's in this post is from the book cited, although I've previously written about voyaging issues, including the Kahoolawe adze. If you go to the blog, and in the upper left corner, put in the search word "voyaging," you'll find a lot of them, most with citations.
Thank you both for the leads.
Post a Comment