|
NOAA image of the weather station at Wai`ale`ale. |
|
Everybody is claiming to be wetter than Wai`ale`ale—the longtime
champion as Wettest Spot on Earth.
There are wetter places in India, in New Zealand, in
Cameroon, they say.
Let me stand and defend Wai`ale`ale.
I’ve been there. It’s wet. So wet that trees can’t grow. The sedges there push themselves up from the
surface in clumps, to keep from drowning.
Much of the time, being there is like sitting in a constant
cold shower.
It is a gorgeous, unworldly landscape. It sits at the edge of plunging green cliffs. When you peer between the
clouds, you can see the ocean nearly a mile below.
To suggest that some dank jungle is wetter than this sacred
place, well, that’s just sacrilege.
We on Kaua`i always knew Wai`ale`ale deserved the crown, but then a
bunch of decades ago, folks in India began claiming the title for Cherrapunji. And
others suggested that Mount Kukui on Maui might actually be wetter.
The place listed on these sites as wettest is Mawsynram, Meghalaya State,
India, with a pretty amazing total of just short of 40 feet—467 inches. It’s a
short distance from Cherrapunji, which also in Meghalaya State.
I will concede that Wai`ale`ale may not be the wettest every
year. I will even concede that with climate change, it may be less wet
than it was. Less wet. You can’t really say drier when you’re talking rainfall
in dozens of feet.
But turning away from Wai`ale`ale as long-term champion? Let’s
just take a breath.
Back in the 20s, the Kaua`i spot measured nearly 57 feet of
rain. That’s 683 inches. But it's averages we're talking about here.
The problem with documenting Wai`ale`ale is that it’s so wet
that the measurements don’t represent all the actual rainfall.
For years, the massive copper drum that held rainfall at Wai`ale`ale was
checked by teams that rode mules part of the way, and then hiked the rest. Sometimes
they huddled in a cave to get out of the incessant rain. Often they couldn’t
get to the summit for weeks or months. (Last time I saw that copper drum, it was stored at Kaua`i Museum.)
Often, by the time they got there, the drum had long since
overflowed. They could only measure what was in the drum. There was no way to
guess what had flowed over.
Plus, the middle of a wet Hawaiian winter is a tough time to
get to the site. You couldn't show up like clockwork on December 31 to measure the rainfall and dump the water for the new year. Thus, not only are annual figures are often underestimates, but it's estimated which of the rainfall fell in October to December,
and which in January to March.
The result is that until the advent of electronic devices
that measured rain without storing water, many of the Wai`ale`ale annual
rainfall counts have a long history, but almost all are necessarily less than the amount that actually fell. Maybe inches less, maybe feet less.
Even conceding all that lost water, the Wai`ale`ale numbers are high.
Winters Takamura, of the Weather Service, reported in 1935 “The annual average
from 12 years of record in the interval between 1911 and 1933 is 456 inches.”
He listed Cherrapunji at 458. And now folks are giving
Mawsynram 467.
But these places are very different. Mawsynram is a town. One
can assume that every millimeter of rainfall is measured and none is allowed to
spill over the rain gauge rim. Also, the rainfall record at Mawsynram is just a
few years long.
Indian media agree that the Mawsynram data is all quite recent, although Cherrapunji’s numbers go way back to the 1800s.
But the title stays with Wai`ale`ale if you count only a few lost inches
of rainfall, water that overflowed the green-stained copper drum and ran down its sides into the
sedges of the Eastern Alaka`i.
Long term? No question. Wai`ale`ale has the pedigree. And if the data were perfect, there's a strong argument that it would drench the competition.
© Jan TenBruggencate 2017
No comments:
Post a Comment