Sunday, June 23, 2019
Ancient botanical ink between far-flung Polynesian cultures, and why does Pitcairn keep showing up?
Polynesian
voyagers visited nearly every island in the tropical and subtropical Pacific,
and they colonized and remained on most of them.
But a remarkable
few were abandoned, despite apparently having the resources to maintain a
population. Pitcairn is one of those.
This remote
high island in the eastern South Pacific is best known as the refuge that the
Bounty mutineers and their Tahitian friends went to, to hide from the British navy.
Pitcairn was uninhabited at the time. But it had been inhabited.
Canoe-sailing
Polynesians had moved there a millenium ago, apparently thrived for 400 years,
and then vanished. Like a sailing ship found drifting with no one aboard, its story
is a mystery. Even today, as a British Overseas Territory, it has difficulty
attracting people. An immigration site for Pitcairn is here.
There is
something eerie about Pitcairnʻs Polynesian history. Where did these islanders
go? Did they abandon their island. Were they killed off by disease? Did war
play a role? Or starvation?
One thing
they may not have been is alone.
In a major study of the Pacific-wide connections between island samples of paper mulberry (wauke,
or Broussonetia papyrifera), which this blog covered in an earlier post,
the plants collected on Pitcairn display deep genetic connections to Polynesiaʻs
ancient past.
Wauke was a
canoe plant—one of the critically important plants that all Polynesian voyaging
canoes carried on their missions of colonization. It was important because it
was the key plant for making fabric.
In studying
the genetic differences and similiarities of wauke collected on different
islands, the researchers found that Pitcairnʻs plants had strong genetic roots
elsewhere in Polynesia.
For example,
they found that "New Guinea is directly connected to Remote Oceania
through Pitcairn."
There are
distinct cultural differences between portions of Polynesia that were occupied
at different times. For example, Fiji, Tonga and Futuna are an older Polynesian
culture, which the authors call Western Remote Oceania (WRO). Islands like
Niue, the Cook Islands, the Marquesas, the Austral Islands and Rapa Nui are
understood to have been populated later. They are called Eastern Remote Oceania (ERO).
New Guinea, in Near Oceania is outside that range and is considered even
older in Polynesian history.
Yet, then there
is Pitcairn.
"We
found Pitcairn plants in a pivotal position between WRO and ERO. In addition,
Pitcairn accessions linked with genotypes from New Guinea in Near Oceania,"
they write.
How to
explain that? Pitcairn is physically in the newer area of Eastern Remote
Oceania. Yet its wauke tells a different story, a story of ancient
connections: "The link between these... groups was Pitcairn,"
the researchers write.
But the authors
suggest that this does not suggest that Pitcairn was an ancient voyaging crossroads
that maintained voyaging connections across thousands of miles of open sea.
"We do not propose a direct migration route from New Guinea to Pitcairn,"
the authors write.
The
explanation, they suggest, is simpler.
Pitcairn was
occupied so long ago, and also abandoned so long ago, that it retained the
ancient genetics of the wauke that the earliest voyagers carried with them.
"This
relationship between samples from New Guinea and Pitcairn represents the
survival of old genotypes on Pitcairn Island due to centuries of isolation
after initial colonization by Austronesian speaking peoples. We suggest that
these genotypes were probably lost on other islands that represent the
intermediate steps of dispersal and migration," they write.
Hawaiʻi, the
Marquesas, Rapa Nui (Easter Island) and Pitcairn are also linked genetically
through wauke.
"The
connections observed in our study through the genetic analysis of paper
mulberry plants... show ties between Rapa Nui and Marquesas and between the
Marquesas and Hawaii," the write.
Ultimately,
the work confirms the conclusion that all Polynesia is connected, and that a
thousand years ago, this stone age culture was tightly connected.
©Jan TenBruggencate
2019
Posted by Jan T at 11:00 AM
Labels: Agriculture, Archaeology, Botany, Evolution, Voyaging
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
Great post, mahalo!
Post a Comment